International Management for Long Term Orientation - myassignmenthelp

Questions: 1.Describe how Hofstedes five cultural dimensions could be used to explain the situation at Lees company. 2. Discuss what, if anything, Lee could do to remain at the company but continue to work in a manner with which he felt comfortable. Explain your reasons 3. Discuss what, if anything, Lee could do to remain at the company but continue to work in a manner with which he felt comfortable. Explain your reasons Answers: 1. Organizations should have a cultural overview of their employees in order to understand them. The need for such an in depth analysis was filled by G.H.Hofstede , when he developed a systematic metric Known as Hofstedes five cultural dimensions that showed cultural inclinations of a particular society. According to his theory, there are five major dimensions which define a culture. Those are Individualism, Long Term Orientation, Masculinity, Power Distance, and Uncertainty avoidance(Anastasia, 2015). This theory can be utilized to understand the case of Lee .He was oriented towards the Australian culture as he was there for a long time .Thus, Lee could not be expected to remain rooted with his Korean ethos and had to adapt when he came back from Australia. With such a back ground, Lee came back to work in Korea which has a very different approach to individualism , the people there prefer to stand for each other and work collectively. It was revealed in the meeting when the manager mentioned that Lee was doing the wrong thing by trying to be exceptional among his equals .In this case it can be seen that the employees harbor a moral obligation towards each other and seniors are looked upon as having a moral authority over the others, whereas Lee was being more individualistic and appeared to be competitive. The problem was further increased when Lee did not understand what trouble his peers were having from him which made him work even harder in order to prove his worth. This again went against the general notion of collective work (Rush, 2017).Thus according to Hofstedes theory, Lee was a victim of difference of individualism between the place he came from, and the place he was working(Leibensperger, 2015). As he had no one to talk to at his workplace, Lee Had no choice but to leave office as soon as his work was complete, which was against the principal of power difference (Lee, 2012).While Lee left office early, his peers waited for the seniors to leave bef ore leaving office, this clearly damaged his reputation as he was unknowingly breaking a general rule, of which he came to know about two months later when he met his manager to convey his feelings to him. At that point, Lee discovered that whatever he was doing to gain confidence among his peers was actually hurting his image. For example, Lee tried to come up with ideas and suggestions at meetings in order to impress his peers, but this gesture was misunderstood as being competitive and hostile by his colleagues. Even the way Lee dressed was different, which, according to the manager, broke the general tradition of the office. Hofstedes dimension takes into account the cultural differences related to acceptance of uncertainty. The way his colleagues were offended by his way of dressing and fashion , it looked like they are less acceptable to change .Lee was simply following a trend as he had been doing in Australia , but this did not work well for him here. 2. It is evident that Lee thinks he has run out of any options to improve his situation. His meeting with the manager also failed to get him a favorable outcome so he was planning to leave and return to Australia as the only option. But Lee can utilize the honest information he received from his manager to handle his problems. During the time in office, whatever Lee did to gather appreciation of his peers was done in the wrong way and Lee did not even know it. Now he has a clearer understanding of the reason behind his problems and he has to find a way out. To start with, Lee can easily accept the fact that his appearance is causing discomfort among his peers. While it may be a common practice in Australia, Lee must have understood now that it is avoided in Korea. This can be viewed as dress code guidelines which he needs to follow(mullingcorp, 2015). This way his first impressions will be more accommodating less hostile than earlier. Another important thing Lee was doing wrong was l eaving office early. If Lee can manage to remain in office a little longer, he would be seen as the one realizing his mistake and trying to make amendments. He may also get to know more about his colleagues, which would help him in the long term(Graham, 2013). These things will not require him to change his basic nature and gut feeling, and so it would be easier to apply. 3. Since the employees were uncomfortable with another colleague who was acting in a manner which was different for them, the manager must make adjustments in the factors related to his workplace which is more collective in nature(Cho Yoon, 2009). In such a scenario, the working environment may be less appealing for reserved or individualistic employees like Lee. While collective team work has potential to generate great performances, sometimes reserved or private employees also contribute a lot to the organization. These employees, if handled properly, can be beneficial for the organization as a whole. Lee appears to have the right talent and a creative mind, to keep Lee in the company; he can be assigned tasks which require fewer interfaces with his colleagues and a defined function, like follow up with clients, researching new markets and product feedback. Since Lee seems to be creative and eager to prove himself, he can be motivated to use his skills as an MBA to scout for new m arkets for business and also follow up with clients on any issues they are facing. This kind of work will involve less interaction with his colleagues as he has to directly report to his manager about any new markets options or a feedback(Apgar, 1998). This can help in avoiding hostilities with his colleagues .The manager must avoid being seen as favorable towards Lee and so he should convince Lee to adjust with the work culture of the office also. Employees need to be explained about the importance of maintaining outfit and other appearances as natural as possible to help them coagulate in organization. Maintaining a simpler outfit and timing with his peers will help him improve his equation with the people at office, while keeping his basic instinct for idea generation and competitiveness. References: Anastasia, 2015. Cleverism. [Online] Available at: https://www.cleverism.com/understanding-cultures-people-hofstede-dimensions/[Accessed 20 August 2017]. Apgar, M., 1998. The Alternative Workplace: Changing Where and How People Work. [Online] Available at: https://hbr.org/1998/05/the-alternative-workplace-changing-where-and-how-people-work[Accessed 20 August 2017]. Cho, T. Yoon, S., 2009. Human Resource Management. [Online] Available at: https://s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/69824/1/kjps_23_2_57-78.pdf[Accessed 20 August 2017]. Graham, K., 2013. Avoiding Conflict in the Workplace. [Online] Available at: https://www.mediate.com/articles/GrahamK1.cfm[Accessed 20 August 2017]. Lee, C. Y., 2012. Korean Culture And Its Influence on Business Practice in South Korea. [Online] Available at: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://www.jimsjournal.org/21%2520Choong%2520Y.%2520Lee.pdf[Accessed 20 August 2017]. Leibensperger, M. S., 2015. Penn State. [Online] Available at: https://sites.psu.edu/leadership/2015/11/28/hofstedes-cultural-dimensions-theory-employee-behavior/ [Accessed 20 August 2017]. mullingcorp, 2015. Adapting to a Corporate Culture. [Online] Available at: https://www.mulling.com/adapting-to-a-corporate-culture/[Accessed 20 August 2017]. Rush, M., 2017. E How. [Online] Available at: https://www.ehow.com/info_8192993_collectivism-vs-individualism-workplace.html[Accessed 20 August 2017].